|Home | Blog Index | Blog Archives | Christianity & Faith Essays
It's time to do away with severe thunderstorm warnings
After all, there are too many instances of them. People have grown accustomed to the warnings and don't pay attention any more. The workload on forecasters is burdensome. People should hear the thunder and see the dark clouds and lightning, and know that they should take cover. They are responsible for their own safety - after all, they voluntarily chose to be outdoors where the hazard is known to be. SPS (special weather statements) are sufficient to cover this weather hazard.
Does that sound rediculous? Well, that is the way that the road icing hazard is being treated. At least 33 people have died from road ice in the US during the past 4 days. This morning, two children on their way to school in Kentucky were killed and their mother seriously hurt during an event that had no warnings, only an overnight SPS in effect.
I challenge any critic of a road ice warning product to come up with a real reason why a hazard that is directly responsible for more deaths than any convective threat does not deserve a warning product, while a severe thunderstorm - a hazard that kills a handful of people a year - gets the massive allocation of resources and manpower that it does.
(Now for the record, I'm not actually advocating dropping the severe thunderstorm warning product - I'm simply using it to illustrate the point.)
NEWS STORY: Children killed in icy road collision, mother remains in hospital
This web site is made possible by support from CIS Internet.
GO: Home | Storm Expeditions | Photography | Extreme Weather Library | Stock Footage | Blog
Featured Weather Library Article: